Engaged Mysticism and Scholarship in the Pursuit of Wisdom.
On the adaptability and flexibility of technology. That makes it so much more powerful
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_tec_egypt_google_twitter_tool
Now see: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20110204/us-tec-egypt-google-twitter-tool/
Please take a look at Continuous Compression CPR: Mouth-to-Mouth ventilation is not required. This is not for infants or small children or for someone drowning. (Via Nelson French)
http://tinyurl.com/2fx8r59
We are as small as a quark, as large as a universe.
Sometimes simple ideas are what we need to practice: “IMAGINE PEACE.”
http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/mike-friends-blog/imagine-peace-2011
I happen to support the idea of transparent governance as a whole. Transparency is what the Internet is all about: while closed, proprietary platforms decline, open source platforms are increasingly flourishing. This is affecting our politics, particularly in the case of WikiLeaks. While I recognize the value of secrets for diplomacy, most stuff that is labeled secret should not be. WikiLeaks has unveiled documents that we have a right to know about and, for that reason, I am glad that we have access to this trove of materials. Citizens of the US and others need to grow up and understand what’s going on in their home countries and in the world.
I happen to support a robust foreign policy and am not against our Iraq policy, although I recognize the ignorance, cynicism, unnecessary violence, and corruption that drove our policy there. Nevertheless, I am glad that we have, for example, the WikiLeaks expose of soldiers indiscriminately killing Iraqi civilians. This is war, and this is what unfortunately and tragically happens in war. Do we naively believe that war is clean and neat and that soldiers always behave appropriately under incredibly stressful conditions? War is filled with horror, moral degradation, and murderous rampages (we can read about that as far back as Homer’s Iliad and the Hebrew Bible). This does not mean that we should never engage in war, although it should be a last resort, but it does mean that we need to acknowledge and recognize what actually does happen in war. However, it will mean that citizens will have to be grown-up and adult about it. They will have to have their eyes open before deciding to embark on a war. That’s what Assange and WikiLeaks force us to be.
At the same time, I don’t think that this is a fair article. Coleen Rowley criticizes Keller for his views on Iraq, not primarily for his portrayal of Assange in Keller’s recent New York Times piece. I don’t think that Keller’s views on Iraq automatically prejudice him in the case of Assange. In spite of its massive flaws, I support our policy in Iraq, and yet I am glad for what Assange has done. Keller was simply pointing out Assange’s strange personality and behavior. Given the significance of WikiLeaks, Keller’s comments here are newsworthy. Assange is part of the story. That does not nullify or diminish the importance of what Assange has done.
http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/mike-friends-blog/nyts-keller-disparages
This is hate speech as far as I am concerned. It is ugly and unacceptable from anyone, especially from a member of the US House of Representatives. Maybe he’s getting the media attention he craves, but these remarks dehumanize a group of people and create a context for discrimination and violence.
Of course, this is far from a free market–when the government picks and chooses the economic winners among its allies and friends. It’s yet another example of government by the few for the few.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/07/world/middleeast/07corruption.html?hpw
Instead of using a word for “God,” perhaps we should simply form an out breath–a glottal stop, like the Hebrew letter, “alef.” When you want to say “God,” just speak with an exhalation.
Here’s an idea. When government officials say we have to cut this or that service, what about the corporations and multi-gazillionaires who aren’t paying their taxes through off-short hide-aways or other loopholes? When a state says, we can’t support this 50 million K program, what about a company that owes 50 million and hasn’t paid it? Why is it that most of us shlubs pay our taxes, but corporations and the mega-rich don’t pay theirs? In Great Britain, an organization called UK Uncut has created a sensation by staging protests and sit-ins at stores whose parent companies have not bothered to pay their taxes.
I don’t see this as solely a liberal thing at all. We should all have to play by basic rules that the law fairly applies. That’s also a deeply conservative value. Maybe tea party fans could join in too. If an entity or person is not paying what they owe, then we have the right to pressure the government into making sure that they do. This is inspiring.
http://www.thenation.com/article/158282/how-build-progressive-tea-party?page=full
Or how someone can move from a Greek immigrant to a follower of self-help gurus to wife of a Republican multi-millionaire to conservative icon (and supporter of Newt Gingrich!) to liberal icon to media maven. Wow, that leaves me breathless. She sure knows how to reinvent herself. And everyone seems to like her, no matter their political persuasion.
This is a moving interview that provides insights both into the thinking of the protesters and of the government. The interview speaks for itself and shows the profound integrity of everyday Egyptians. I am struck by the deep concern for dignity that Wael consistently mentions. There is a sense among Egyptians that this government has shamed them and treated them as children. Young protesters like Wael are educated, cosmopolitan, entrepreneurial, thoughtful, and modern. They are the future leaders of Egypt and other Middle Eastern nations. While there are many perils and chances for disasters, Wael and his colleagues should give us all reason to hope for greater peace and prosperity in the Middle East in the long term.
http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/02/08/subtitled-video-of-wael-ghonims-emotional-tv-interview/
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/09/world/middleeast/09ghonim.html?hp
This is illuminating. Bank speculators not only caused the crisis in the US and Europe through dubious housing deals, but they have sparked unrest all over the world, now in Tunisia and Egypt, by artificially ginning up the commodities markets. Blessings, Larry
http://www.webofdebt.com/articles/egyptian_tinderbox.php
In the end, you can imprison a person, but you cannot lock up the internet or social media. Egypt’s attempt to control the spread of protest by arresting social media entrepreneurs did not succeed. However, we can sure see where the real power is now.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/08/world/middleeast/08google.html
If you are squeamish, please do not watch this video. It is hard and painful to see.
The slaughtering and torture of dolphins is a tradition that no longer makes any sense. Dolphins (and whales) are highly intelligent, sophisticated, relational sea mammals. In Greek tradition, dolphins were sacred and viewed as friends of humans. This video and others have brought attention to a horrible practice that we need to stop not only because of its violence and the slow, painful deaths of dolphins, but because it degrades our own moral conscience as human beings.
Blessings,
Larry
http://www.youtube.com/user/delfinusdelphis#p/a/u/0/dY2Fd9eQGZE
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/sep/14/dolphin-slaughter-hunting-japan-taiji (an article that summarizes the practice in Taijii)
http://www.savejapandolphins.org/
The word, “God,” is a label that often cuts us off from “God,” our Source.
Rigid labels close us off from one another and ourselves.
While many (including me) emphasize the religious and spiritual roots of yoga, Tara Stiles takes another approach. She just wants people to do yoga and improve their lives and bodies. She rebels against those teachers who see themselves as gurus. Her goal is to make yoga accessible rather than difficult and total. Deepak Chopra is among her students. I am impressed by her authenticity and determination to simplify this ancient tradition.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/23/nyregion/23stretch.html?sq=yoga&st=cse&scp=2&pagewanted=all
If you are opposed to academic boycotts and divestment (now frequently aimed at Israel) , please forward this to anyone you think might be interested.
http://www.spme.net/cgi-bin/display_petitions.cgi?ID=21
http://spme.net/cgi-bin/display_petitions.cgi?ID=9&Action=View
Many have spoken on the rise of antisemitism on the left in recent years, but antisemitism is alive and well on the right as well, even among those who ostensibly support Israel.
This is article is now archived. See instead the op-ed by Dana Milbank for the Washington Post: http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2011/04/06/AFNEgnqC_story.html
Many commentators (including me) have noted conservative support for Arab/Islamic dictatorships in the Middle East. But this is no less true of the left who have readily defended tyranny in Iran and other places while condemning Israel, which is a democratic state. Here is an essay on this by Alan Dershowitz.
I find it intriguing that ideologues (whether conservative or liberal) are much more likely than non-ideologues to shelve their supposed principles when an article of their ideology is under threat. Here the left shelves democracy in order to affirm underdog Arab/Muslim societies and to condemn bully Israel. Some on the right do the same by supporting dictatorships in Egypt and Saudi Arabia (for example), claiming that stability trumps democracy–except when the US invaded Iraq.
http://www.hudson-ny.org/1860/hard-left-arab-despotism
Perhaps this is the beginning of a much larger movement toward self-empowerment.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/03/business/economy/03class.html?pagewanted=all
This satirical skit is hilarious. I’ve been laughing all day. It shows how wisdom is a lot less likely to take hold at the age of 16 than at the age of 66. Unlike music or science prodigies, individuals usually develop wisdom only with time and experience. (Via Dianne Bazell and Greg Davis)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ih-2O_gdYZo
Anger transformed can repair a world and heal a universe.
http://www.googleartproject.com/
This is a momentous development, making the art of the great museums available to anyone with an internet connection. It will have a profound impact on world culture, erasing many geographical and socio-economic boundaries. (Via Nelson French)
http://www.thenation.com/blog/158183/washington-embraces-al-jazeera
This is an excellent discussion of Al-Jazeera and its crucial role in the Middle East. The Bush administration hated Al-Jazeera when it did reporting that was not supportive of US policy in Iraq, and it went after their reporters. Of course, presidential administrations in the past have not liked a lot of US media either and have targeted them as well. Now we see the essential importance of an active, free press, and the current US government finally embraces it. Democracy and freedom depend upon it. The more openness and transparency that a truly free press demands, the greater the chance for truly humane, compassionate societies to evolve. Ironic that it took an Arabic-language news organization to show us this.
Very interesting. I don’t think Michelle Goldberg is correct on Israel–that they are opposed to democracy in the Middle East because Israel has found it easier to deal with dictators and because stability trumps freedom. Yes, there are many Israelis who take this position. But in general Israelis are divided between those who believe that democracy will ultimately promote peace in region and those who fear that calls for democracy will lead to Islamic dictatorships and instability. Of course, Israelis have good reason to more anxious than us. They have violence and the threat of annihilation at their doorstep. Nevertheless, Israelis have a diversity of views on this, especially because of their own democratic traditions.
As for myself, I am deeply Jewish and Zionist. As a Jew and a Zionist, I support the aspirations of all people for freedom, no matter where they are. How can I not do so? That includes Egyptians, Iranians, and anyone else. I strongly believe that free, open, democratic societies are not only a human right and a step forward in human consciousness, but are a gateway to peace and reconciliation in the long run. No doubt there will be short- and mid-term challenges, but democratic societies are much less likely to engage in war with their neighbors, and that includes the Middle East.
By the way, I know that there are Egyptians who are worried about the image of their society in the world. I realize you are concerned about chaos, violence, and instability and the negative image that the world will see. My comments may not carry much weight with you, but as a Jew and a supporter of Israel, I am deeply moved by these demonstrations. I see nobility, honor, courage, and dignity. The chaos is not the fault of Egyptians, but the fault of a government that has lost its legitimacy. I have always been impressed by Egypt, its culture, and its magnificent, rich, long history. The events of recent days have only served to increase my admiration and respect. I keep the Egyptian people in my prayers every day.
We are all Adam, part of the same cosmic body, reaching out from one end of the universe to the other.
I don’t agree with Religion Link’s description (http://www.religionlink.com/topic_110131.php) of the Muslim Brotherhood as “not simply a religion, but a way of life.” Indeed, the Muslim Brotherhood believes that. Yet, even though the Muslim Brotherhood is not monolithic, it also believes that Egypt should be an Islamic state, as should other Muslim countries in the Middle East. It does not historically affirm freedom, openness, an entrepreneurial economy, or secular democratic values such as a free press, freedom of speech, and freedom of assembly. Unlike Iranian Shi’ites, the Mujhadeen, and Jihadists generally, the Muslim Brotherhood is not wedded to intimidation and violence as the primary means of achieving its goals, but it is willing to use violence when it sees fit. For example, members assassinated King Abdullah I in Jordan in 1951, tried to assassinate Gamal Abdel Nasser in 1954, were implicated in the assassination of Anwar El Sadat in 1981, assassinated a number of moderate Arab leaders in the 1950’s, and perpetrated other terrorist attacks including the Hebron massacre of Jews in1929. Since the 1970’s and 80’s, it has renounced violence and has spoken of Islamic democracy, but given its history and its hostility to generally accepted democratic values, it would not be unreasonable to view its democratic advocacy very skeptically. Further, Hamas (which rules Gaza) is part of the Muslim Brotherhood, and it has consistently used violence against both Israelis and Palestinians as an important tactical component. In Egypt, the Muslim Brotherhood views Israel as the enemy of Arabs and Muslims. The Muslim Brotherhood has also had a long-standing, well-documented admiration of, and support, for Nazi ideology. In general, the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt now uses moderate tactics, but its goal is still an Islamic state. And, remember, calling for Islam to be a part of government is not the same as calling for an Islamic State, with Sharia law and all its accoutrements. There’s certainly the possibility that the Muslim Brotherhood has changed and will continue to evolve into a democratic movement, but there will have to be more evidence to trust that.
Here is a link from Juan Cole, suggesting that a takeover by the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt is unlikely. Many Egyptians who are religious and who oppose the current government also have democratic, secular values. And there is a long tradition of secular politics in Egypt. There is also widespread support for Islamic values, but not necessarily for an Islamic state: http://www.juancole.com/2011/02/why-egypt-2011-is-not-iran-1979.html . I hope Cole is right.
That said, in the final analysis, prosperity and peace in the Middle East depend upon Muslim/Arab societies developing democratic traditions and cultures of openness, That will be good for everyone, including the US and Israel, in the long run. Of course, the “long run” can take a long time, and there can be a lot of turbulence and suffering in-between.
Antisemitism is on the rise. That’s not a surprise in hard times, but it gets a little disturbing when an election night loser (Republican Nick Popaditch, known as Gunny Pop on Facebook) takes a mob of his supporters and corners the winner (Democrat Bob Filner) at his victory celebration on November 2 (2010). Using physical intimidation and lots of nasty language, including shouting “Jew” at Filner and his wife, the bullies get their chance to intimidate someone who is “liberal” (whatever that means) and Jewish. Wonder if that bears any resemblance to the . . . 1930’s.
In any case, this is just one of many examples of violent rhetoric run amok. We all need to take a hard line against over-the-top language and posturing, whether on the left or the right. People have a right to speak wherever and however they want, but we have a right to ask them to stop when they step over the line, not to listen to them when they continue, and to prevent physical intimidation. Otherwise, we enter a gateway into tyranny and authoritarianism.
http://lastblogonearth.com/2010/11/03/nick-popaditchs-last-stand/ (particularly the second video at the bottom of the page)
http://eastcountymagazine.org/node/4690
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rOeRGjkC42g&feature=player_embedded
Playing a role in life is a choice, but we can always set it aside and play another.
This article is superb: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/31/opinion/31douthat.html
There is a kind of imperialistic arrogance that exists in the U.S. on both the left and the right. Each side criticizes the other for allegedly allowing some international event or crisis to take place: “If only the U.S. had done things our way, not yours, then all would have turned out well.”
Yet the reality is different. We have much less control of events than we think. The U.S. cannot determine what others do, especially when social media and internet technology allow open information flow. We need to take a more humble approach to foreign policy and stop assuming that we are omnipotent.
Here is the link to my original comment at the New York Times: http://community.nytimes.com/comments/www.nytimes.com/2011/01/31/opinion/31douthat.html?sort=oldest
Creation is a flow of multiplicity in an ocean of oneness.
Copyright secured by Digiprove © 2014 Laurence KantChaos is always lurking behind sturdy structures, offering the possibility of change and thus transformation. This is the story of Genesis and of our world today.
I don’t buy food at Walmart, but Walmart’s recent decision to cut sodium and use whole grains will have a major impact on the broader US food market. And that’s a good thing.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/20/business/20walmart.html?_r=1&hp
Space between breaths, dawn and twilight, midnight, change of seasons, a new moon, being born, marrying, dying: Gateways where the Source reveals Itself.
This is a moving story, a pitcher who gave up 12 million dollars, because he wanted to do the right thing and keep his self-respect. Inspiring.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/27/sports/baseball/27meche.html?hp
If we want others to see and acknowledge us, we must first see and acknowledge ourselves.
The past provides the experiential data out of which we create wisdom.
Important matters are both more simple and more complex than we think. I always find myself revolting against both those who facilely make broad generalizations and those who won’t say anything conclusive. Events and ideas are more subtle than easy solutions or the denial of any solutions. Such is the dynamic of the One and the Many.
Robert Reich notes the fundamental difference between the economies of the US and China: China has a plan, and we don’t. This hands-off approach has characterized both Democratic and Republican presidential administrations. In general, the US relies on faith in the free market place, while China assumes that the government must make careful plans to advance its interests. Consequently, the Chinese invest heavily in green industries, even when there is no immediate profit and cost is high, because this technology is the future. Whoever controls it will have an enormous advantage in global competition. The US engages in talk, but not much action.
The US has an almost magical faith in the free market. It’s almost as if the US believes that simply reciting an ideological creed will guarantee economic success.
The US still has one advantage: the deep creativity and inventiveness that marks our culture. Americans do not rely on the past and on tradition, but look for new and original ways of doing things. This has always carried the US through before, and I hope it will continue to do so. But can the US rely on this, while others make plans?
The whole issue relates to an even more fundamental matter. Will human beings rely on ideology or on practical, integrative approaches to solve problems? Ideology is pure theory, ideas separate from concrete reality. Communism, Marxism, radical free market capitalism, absolute pacifism, religious fundamentalism, and postmodern theory all fall into that category. They are ideologies rather than evidence-based methods. Significantly ideologues exist on both the left and right. among both the secular and the religious. Even when something contradicts the theory, followers of the theory simply ignore the data, because fundamentally day-to-day life is messy, confusing, ambiguous, contradictory, and therefore too difficult to interpret.
While the US has recently been primarily concerned with ideas about what should work, the Chinese and others are approaching matters pragmatically, testing for what actually does work. The US would do well to return to its historical roots in pragmatism and develop more of a balance between theory and practice.
http://robertreich.org/post/2830348699
Becoming exists in the past and the future, not in the present.
Being born means that we enter creation: Being and becoming are joined
While we often sail along in life with seemingly nothing happening, awareness comes in explosive bursts, punctuating the monotony with volcanic eruptions.
Other times awareness slowly creeps up on us, grabbing us little by little as if it was always there.
“As state universities cut back on humanities programs, LaGuardia Community College in Queens, N.Y., is going in the opposite direction. At LaGuardia, philosophy is king and challenging the stereotype that four-year colleges are for intellectuals and community colleges are for career training” (via Dianne Bazell). Humanities offer students training in how to analyze, to think, to synthesize, and to transform themselves in a fast-past, changing, world. Humanities also give students a chance to think about what matters, which is is a crucial skill for employees, organizations. and enterprises that must reinvent themselves. (Via Dianne Bazell)
http://www.npr.org/2011/01/04/132633254/philosophy-valued-at-one-community-college
I have today added a number of jokes to the Jewish humor section, including Woody Allen’s classic “Sacrifice of Isaac” and “The Pope and the Jews” (a wonderful story that I use in multifaith gatherings to illustrate the importance of understanding how two different people can size up a situation completely differently). Take a look: http://mysticscholar.org/category/5jewish-quarter/humor-jewish-quarter/
We cannot get to the One except through the Many.
Being and Becoming: Being is who we are authentically; becoming is why we enter the cycle of life. Being teaches us that the authentic present is eternal. Becoming teaches us that change is ongoing and inevitable. Wisdom involves integrating both.
For anyone who wants to see my film rates, take a look at the following link: http://www.imdb.com/mymovies/list?l=7737781 I think that you will have to join IMDB (Internet Movie Data Base), but this is a wonderful website, with full details on almost any film ever made anywhere.
This is a timely piece giving a real sense of the difference between modern fitness yoga and the authentic tradition of spiritual discipline practiced by Indian yogis and yoginis. Yoga is an ancient spiritual practice that was then adapted in other religious traditions in the twentieth century. Yet, it has its roots in Indian religion, and this is how it first came to the US. Yoga is not necessarily exercise or breath work, but a system of feeling, thought, and experience. In fact, Yoga does not even have to involve the body at all, but can consist of communal activities or study. Yoga simply means “union” (as in union with God).
http://www.religiondispatches.org/archive/culture/3917/mormon-born_daya_mata_typifies_american_yoga/
Because of the massive information overload that affects soldiers in the US military due to a heavy emphasis on sophisticated technology and multi-tasking, there is greater need than ever for awareness and grounding. This article shows the unstated influence of Buddhist meditation, with its ubiquitous focus on mindfulness–an intriguing development. (via Dianne Bazell)
Despite some assessments of the BP oil spill and the appearance of the Gulf waters, damage to coral, plankton, small creatures like worms, and soil is massive. The foundation of the deep ocean life chain and ecosystem is in trouble.
http://www.thenation.com/article/157723/search-bps-oil?page=full
An astute observation from Robert Wright: Whether we’re on the left or the right, when we isolate ourselves from those who disagree with us and put them into the category of “alien,” we dehumanize others and make violent acts easier to commit. Blessings, Larry
http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/01/11/before-hatred-comes-fear/
Naming the Source is impossible. Once you name “God,” you are no longer describing the Source.
This is an excellent piece, emphasizing the existence of real violence over the past two years. Frank Rich argues that you don’t have to look to rhetoric, but to actual acts. Though violent rhetoric and threats of violence are likely to encourage and foment actual violence, Rich has a point when he argues that we should pay particular attention to violent incidents. Even when they cause minimal damage, they are precursors to larger scale bloodshed.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/16/opinion/16rich.html
On rhetoric, see my piece: http://mysticscholar.org/2011/01/10/violent-rhetoric-and-tucson-again/
Our lives are holy texts, chapters in the sacred scripture of humanity.
Our lives are sacred stories. We are here to tell them and inspire others.
There are those moments–moments when you enter a gateway, and you feel the presence of God. I remember Erice in Sicily: eating a meal at a local restaurant, lingering, savoring the garlic, the olive oil and the pasta–and most of all the wine–cold, white, shimmering, crisp–Ambrosia, the best wine I ever tasted, the same for Dianne and for our friend Tony. Was it the wine, the town, the restaurant, or the moment with my wife and our friend? I don’t know, but it felt like heaven: like a dream in which my senses put me deep underwater, gliding effortlessly, with no particular goal, just living fully.
Symbols are the medium through which feeling finds form.
Who are we? Definable bodies? But human bodies are composed mostly of water and space. We are descendants of beings who lived in oceans, lakes, rivers, and streams. Our bodies are not solid, but fluid and open. Every day the cells in our bodies are born and die. Every seven years, we are composed of entirely new sets of cells. Why do we fix ourselves into an illusion of isolation and rigidity, as concrete form, frozen images, as if we are separate things? In fact, we are permeable, protean, one composed of many, continually transforming. Made in the image of God, we are no/thing, one through many, colored glass turning in a kaleidoscope, always in flux, movement in form.
In the bleakest moments, our strength comes from where we least expect it.
Social Widgets powered by AB-WebLog.com.