The I resides in a body, but the authentic You resides everywhere.
Because of their engagement with the world and importance Jews place on repairing the world, Jews have consistently ranked at the top end of philanthropic giving.
http://www.jta.org/news/article/2011/02/08/2742903/jews-show-well-on-annual-list-of-top-givers
This provides an excellent review of history over the past century and provides an analysis of anti-Israel revisionist history.
http://www.tnr.com/print/book/review/kai-bird-mandelbaums-gate
A personal account of how Egyptians used non-violent protest to overcome their fear and bring down a dictator (via Nelson French):
While I supported the Iraq invasion (and still do in spite of the massive flaws), I also have no doubt that Bush and his supporters were motivated by poll ratings, as this short piece shows. This is politics, and it’s the way things works here and everywhere, whatever the issue or cause, liberal or conservative. I am under no illusions in this regard: almost any policy (good or bad, even war) is partly motivated by political self-interest.
Pick a topic, and watch countries grow and shrink. Hover your mouse over a country, and get more info. A wonderful website.
http://show.mappingworlds.com/world/?lang=EN
You would think with all the really dangerous terrorists running around, we would be focusing on them rather than on people who are actually trying to improve the planet. The vast majority of enviro activists are peaceful or engaging in civil disobedience. Why are we engaging in this madness? Do corporate interests own us lock, stock, and barrel?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2011/feb/15/activism-protest
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/feb/14/energy-firms-activists-intelligence-gathering
What is the Source like? Like the wind. You cannot hold or see it, but it’s there just the same.
How do Israel and Syria make peace? The beauty, harmony, and strategic importance of this region show the complexity of this question.
http://www.boston.com/travel/articles/2011/02/13/so_beautiful____so_strategic/?page=full
Iran appears, at least in part, to have recovered from the Stuxnet worm attack. The Iranians have replaced the hardware, but it is unclear whether they have control over the software.
On the other hand, the New Intelligence Estimate suggests that the Stuxnet worm has had considerable impact. Just as important, the sanctions seem to be having an impact on some Iranian leaders, who question the wisdom of developing a nuclear weapons program given the economic impact of sanctions.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703373404576148581167010572.html
Serious human rights abuses in Egypt remain:
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/18/world/middleeast/18missing.html?hp=&pagewanted=all
Given possible destabilizing effects, this is something to watch: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/18/world/middleeast/18egypt.html?hp
Have we reached the tipping point? http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/feb/03/tree-deaths-amazon-climate
This is a move toward some kind of fairness (I hope).
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/02/15/merscorp-decision_n_823302.html
This essay is impressive. Brendan O’Neil absolutely nails it. This is all about victims and who is the biggest victim.
Back when Israelis looked like victims in the fifties and sixties, the same lefties loved Israelis and Jews (by the way, I’m no conservative either). Israelis and Jews were good victims then too. Until Israel won wars in 1967 and 1973, the Israelis and Jews (because of the Holocaust experience) were the favored victims. Many Jews were glad to have their support, but now I realize what that support actually meant. Jews are fine for these protesters as long as they remain victims: holocaust survivors, victims of anti-semitism, and poor Israelis facing massive odds against far more populous Arabs. However, God forbid that they should defend themselves and emerge victorious. Like the Palestinians, Jews were a tribe that middle-class empathizers could “coo” over. We’re still a tribe. Only we’ve made the mistake of forming a prosperous, democratic county and protecting ourselves.
There’s no question that Israel has done things that are problematic, especially the settlement policy. Israelis have also fallen into the trap of responding to every Palestinian provocation with force. There’s racism against Arabs that is prevalent in Israel.
Still this is a democratic society (the only full-fledged democracy in the Middle East) that is under siege from surrounding countries who want to annihilate it and to remove all Jews from the Middle East. Israel’s own Arab citizens have more economic opportunity, mobility, and freedom than the vast majority of other Arabs and Muslims in the Middle East. It is a diverse society that has women serving in the military, gay pride parades, as well as Arab and Ethiopian Jews.
In the end, whether you are Israeli/Jewish or Palestinian, most in the West look at you as a symbol, a trope. Not many really give a hoot about you, except in so far as you conform to some preconceptions that elicit feelings of tenderness or revulsion. It’s not just liberals, but conservatives, as well, especially some fundamentalist Christians. The latter see Palestinians as Muslim allies of the Anti-Christ ready to destroy Christianity, while Jews are ancient witnesses to Christ whose presence in the “Holy Land” will help usher in the Second Coming. Of course, in this scenario, the returned Christ will pretty much kill all of us, Muslim and Jew alike, unless we convert.
It would be nice if people could look at us, both Jews and our Palestinian cousins, as fellow human beings. Perhaps that’s too much to ask.
Freedom is a choice we have every second of every day.
We do not start in the same place at the beginning of our lives. It’s not where we end up that matters, but how far we travel.
I stand with Sharansky. Freedom is the only real hope for peace. In the end, if we support dictatorships against democratic movements, we will alienate the vast majority of Arab/Muslim populations, and we will give them only one option: the Muslim Brotherhood. A truly democratic society, not only with elections, but with independent institutions and the capacity to pursue whatever wants to pursue (i.e. freedom), sounds the death knell for extremist, violent, backward-looking, tyrannical, theocratic religious movements. Freedom is also what the U.S., Israel, and other democracies are supposed to stand for. Of course, failure is possible, but the risk is worth it: http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Editorials/Article.aspx?id=207745
See also the excellent article by Jackson Diehl on the upsides of Egypt’s revolution
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/02/12/AR2011021200483.html
I don’t see an Iranian-style revolution as happening, especially given the strong secular culture in Egypt, the existence of many Muslims who support democracy, the antipathy of many Egyptians for Iran, the role of the army, and the educated techie youth generation. But it’s something to pay attention to and will probably produce some major bumps in the road.
http://www.tabletmag.com/news-and-politics/58461/jewel-of-the-nile/
Here’s also an excellent, clear-eyed summary of the Muslim Brotherhood: http://www.hudson-ny.org/1882/muslim-brotherhood-reality
This is what more states and the federal government should be doing. Unfortunately, many people don’t want to help out, because they believe that homeowners should take responsibility for their poor judgement. However, government failed to protect home buyers from predatory banks and loan agencies, while massive foreclosures are driving down prices for everyone (not just those facing bankruptcy). Therefore, we have both moral and practical reasons to support this kind of aid to those facing the trauma of losing their homes.
http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-keep-your-home-20110210,0,2404099.story
This would be scary.
http://dailybulletin.yale.edu/article.aspx?id=8134
For those of us who care about seed integrity, and its relation to human and planetary health, this is not good news.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/28/business/28alfalfa.html?hp
As in most things, practicing what you will be doing at a given time is excellent preparation for actually doing it.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/21/science/21memory.html?hp
We should think of the Source (God) not as an enormous entity, but as the tiniest particle in existence–that from which everything originates. That’s why we need to let go of our I, our ego. It’s just too big.
The Wisconsin governor’s proposal is simply an out and out attempt at destroying public unions. By taking away collective bargaining and by making it almost impossible to organize and collect dues, the governor is removing a basic human right: the right to organize and bargain.
Now, I am certainly aware of the the flaws in unions: corruption, living in the past, backwardness, seniority over merit, and general ineffectiveness. The inflexible opposition of unions to workers contributing more to health care and pensions is a serious problem.
At the same time, unions are responsible for worker rights, lunch breaks, the 8-hour day, 40-hour work weeks, overtime, vacations, the weekend, child labor laws, the retirement system, and so much more. In general, people are unaware that the lives they lead are possible because people died and suffered violence on picket lines. No matter how flawed our unions are, they serve as a check against an inherently unbalanced relationship between management and workers. It’s not ultimately the fault of management that absence of unions has led to abuse–it’s simply the human condition. Without unions (or some kind of collective bargaining forces), workers (both union and non-union) will find themselves going backwards, increasingly losing their time off and unable to live middle-class lives. And management will find itself saddled with unhappy and unproductive workers, as they shuffle paper on the deck of the Titanic.
I don’t know what to advocate here in terms of union tactics, but I can say that the time is coming when what the Egyptians had to do in a non-violent protest against a cruel dictatorship, we will have to do to preserve our basic human rights in the workplace. The governor of Wisconsin is betting on public dislike of unions, as he and his corporate, billionaire backers use one segment of the populace to beat down the other. In the ensuing division, both groups will go down the tubes while the extreme rich grow even richer–unless people stand up for their rights. They will to have risk their jobs and well-being to make sure that they preserve a reasonable standard of living, which is the foundation on which our democratic republic stands.
This country is not supposed to be a tyrannical plutocracy, where billionaires secretly run the rest of us poor slobs by convincing some of us that we can be rich just like them. That’s nothing more than a con. Of course, wealth can be a worthy goal, but it should not be the primary value of a humane society, nor will it lead to a nation’s economic prosperity. That only occurs when everybody works together, when we each have a voice in the governance of our society, and when we each have realistic access to educational and vocational opportunity.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/12/us/12unions.html?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=tha23 (via Nelson French)
Pretty much sounds like most institutions (private and public) in our country.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/02/09/AR2011020902119.html (now archived)
See now: http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2011-02-09-cia-promotions-errors_N.htm or
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/02/09/at-cia-grave-mistakes-led_n_820627.html
We will do and we will hear (Ex 24.7): Action is the avenue to contemplation and enlightenment. When you do a good deed, an act of lovingkindness, go and meditate afterwards. The universe will open to you in your humility.
Very interesting. Only 15% approve of the Muslim Brotherhood, while a mere 1% would support a Muslim Brotherhood candidate. Elbaradei has very little popular support, unlike Amr Mousa. Even more surprising, a plurality of Egyptians support the peace treaty with Israel (37% pro vs. 27% con). All in all, this is good news.
http://washingtoninstitute.org/templateC11.php?CID=543
A window into horror:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/feb/09/egypt-torture-machine-mubarak-security
So often we seek to go somewhere, to reach a goal, but we’re all floating on a river toward the same place.
So agonizingly close–still.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/13/magazine/13Israel-t.html?pagewanted=1&hp
On the adaptability and flexibility of technology. That makes it so much more powerful
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_tec_egypt_google_twitter_tool
Now see: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20110204/us-tec-egypt-google-twitter-tool/
Please take a look at Continuous Compression CPR: Mouth-to-Mouth ventilation is not required. This is not for infants or small children or for someone drowning. (Via Nelson French)
http://tinyurl.com/2fx8r59
We are as small as a quark, as large as a universe.
Sometimes simple ideas are what we need to practice: “IMAGINE PEACE.”
http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/mike-friends-blog/imagine-peace-2011
I happen to support the idea of transparent governance as a whole. Transparency is what the Internet is all about: while closed, proprietary platforms decline, open source platforms are increasingly flourishing. This is affecting our politics, particularly in the case of WikiLeaks. While I recognize the value of secrets for diplomacy, most stuff that is labeled secret should not be. WikiLeaks has unveiled documents that we have a right to know about and, for that reason, I am glad that we have access to this trove of materials. Citizens of the US and others need to grow up and understand what’s going on in their home countries and in the world.
I happen to support a robust foreign policy and am not against our Iraq policy, although I recognize the ignorance, cynicism, unnecessary violence, and corruption that drove our policy there. Nevertheless, I am glad that we have, for example, the WikiLeaks expose of soldiers indiscriminately killing Iraqi civilians. This is war, and this is what unfortunately and tragically happens in war. Do we naively believe that war is clean and neat and that soldiers always behave appropriately under incredibly stressful conditions? War is filled with horror, moral degradation, and murderous rampages (we can read about that as far back as Homer’s Iliad and the Hebrew Bible). This does not mean that we should never engage in war, although it should be a last resort, but it does mean that we need to acknowledge and recognize what actually does happen in war. However, it will mean that citizens will have to be grown-up and adult about it. They will have to have their eyes open before deciding to embark on a war. That’s what Assange and WikiLeaks force us to be.
At the same time, I don’t think that this is a fair article. Coleen Rowley criticizes Keller for his views on Iraq, not primarily for his portrayal of Assange in Keller’s recent New York Times piece. I don’t think that Keller’s views on Iraq automatically prejudice him in the case of Assange. In spite of its massive flaws, I support our policy in Iraq, and yet I am glad for what Assange has done. Keller was simply pointing out Assange’s strange personality and behavior. Given the significance of WikiLeaks, Keller’s comments here are newsworthy. Assange is part of the story. That does not nullify or diminish the importance of what Assange has done.
http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/mike-friends-blog/nyts-keller-disparages
This is hate speech as far as I am concerned. It is ugly and unacceptable from anyone, especially from a member of the US House of Representatives. Maybe he’s getting the media attention he craves, but these remarks dehumanize a group of people and create a context for discrimination and violence.
Of course, this is far from a free market–when the government picks and chooses the economic winners among its allies and friends. It’s yet another example of government by the few for the few.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/07/world/middleeast/07corruption.html?hpw
Instead of using a word for “God,” perhaps we should simply form an out breath–a glottal stop, like the Hebrew letter, “alef.” When you want to say “God,” just speak with an exhalation.
Here’s an idea. When government officials say we have to cut this or that service, what about the corporations and multi-gazillionaires who aren’t paying their taxes through off-short hide-aways or other loopholes? When a state says, we can’t support this 50 million K program, what about a company that owes 50 million and hasn’t paid it? Why is it that most of us shlubs pay our taxes, but corporations and the mega-rich don’t pay theirs? In Great Britain, an organization called UK Uncut has created a sensation by staging protests and sit-ins at stores whose parent companies have not bothered to pay their taxes.
I don’t see this as solely a liberal thing at all. We should all have to play by basic rules that the law fairly applies. That’s also a deeply conservative value. Maybe tea party fans could join in too. If an entity or person is not paying what they owe, then we have the right to pressure the government into making sure that they do. This is inspiring.
http://www.thenation.com/article/158282/how-build-progressive-tea-party?page=full
Social Widgets powered by AB-WebLog.com.